<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linking For Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fantasyballjunkie.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fantasyballjunkie.com/?p=615</link>
	<description>We've Got Your Fix</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:45:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: drgravitee</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyballjunkie.com/?p=615&#038;cpage=1#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>drgravitee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fantasyballjunkie.com/?p=615#comment-179</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Sandoval will qualify as catcher in some leagues, but not in others.  I think he just squeaked in for Yahoo leagues (he had 11 starts and needed 10), for what that&#039;s worth.  Six, huh?  That&#039;s pretty high.  Nice.  I think my love for Sandoval and his stealthy fantasy value is growing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Sandoval will qualify as catcher in some leagues, but not in others.  I think he just squeaked in for Yahoo leagues (he had 11 starts and needed 10), for what that&#8217;s worth.  Six, huh?  That&#8217;s pretty high.  Nice.  I think my love for Sandoval and his stealthy fantasy value is growing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyballjunkie.com/?p=615&#038;cpage=1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fantasyballjunkie.com/?p=615#comment-177</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t include Sandoval because I believed at the time that in most leagues he wouldn&#039;t qualify. I now realize that in fact, many leagues now have 5- or 10-game minimums.
Went back and checked the CHONE projections. Sandoval would rank #6 as a catcher, behind Soto and ahead of Napoli.
I&#039;m not too high on Napoli myself. I&#039;d rather Sandoval.
But I might edge Sandoval below Doumit. I guess that puts him around or maybe slightly above the veteran duo of Posada and Molina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t include Sandoval because I believed at the time that in most leagues he wouldn&#8217;t qualify. I now realize that in fact, many leagues now have 5- or 10-game minimums.<br />
Went back and checked the CHONE projections. Sandoval would rank #6 as a catcher, behind Soto and ahead of Napoli.<br />
I&#8217;m not too high on Napoli myself. I&#8217;d rather Sandoval.<br />
But I might edge Sandoval below Doumit. I guess that puts him around or maybe slightly above the veteran duo of Posada and Molina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drgravitee</title>
		<link>http://www.fantasyballjunkie.com/?p=615&#038;cpage=1#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator>drgravitee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fantasyballjunkie.com/?p=615#comment-176</guid>
		<description>FB Junk: Where do you see Pablo Sandoval fitting into the Catcher rankings?  My heart says he gets a least a grade of &quot;B,&quot; but that could be wishful thinking. - TKSink</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FB Junk: Where do you see Pablo Sandoval fitting into the Catcher rankings?  My heart says he gets a least a grade of &#8220;B,&#8221; but that could be wishful thinking. &#8211; TKSink</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
